Original Research

An assessment of the information content of South African alien species databases

Katelyn T. Faulkner, Dian Spear, Mark P. Robertson, Mathieu Rouget, John R.U. Wilson
Bothalia | Vol 45, No 1 | a1103 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v45i1.1103 | © 2015 Katelyn T. Faulkner, Dian Spear, Mark P. Robertson, Mathieu Rouget, John R.U. Wilson | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 October 2014 | Published: 29 May 2015

About the author(s)

Katelyn T. Faulkner, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South Africa; Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Dian Spear, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South Africa; Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Mark P. Robertson, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Mathieu Rouget, Centre for Invasion Biology, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
John R.U. Wilson, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South Africa; Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Abstract

National alien species databases indicate the state of a country’s biodiversity and provide useful data for research on invasion biology and the management of invasions. In South Africa there are several different published alien species databases, but these databases were created for different purposes and vary in completeness and information content. We assessed the information content of published South African alien species databases in the context of other such databases globally, and evaluated how the information content of South African databases varies across taxonomic groups. Although introduction pathway, date of introduction, region of origin and current broad-scale distribution data are available for most taxonomic groups assessed (60% – 90%), data on invasion status, introduction effort and introduction source are available for few taxonomic groups (5% – 18%). South African alien species databases have lower information content than the detailed databases available in other parts of the world and thus cannot be utilised to the same extent. We conclude with 11 recommendations for improving South African alien species databases. In particular, we highlight the data types that should be incorporated in future databases and argue that existing data should be collated in a single, standardised meta-database to facilitate cross-taxon comparisons, highlight gaps in effort, and inform managers and policy makers concerned with alien species.

Keywords

biological invasions; introduced species; catalogue; data availability; data gaps; species list

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5631
Total article views: 8782

 

Crossref Citations

1. Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study
Katelyn T. Faulkner, Mark P. Robertson, Mathieu Rouget, John R. U. Wilson
Biological Invasions  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 73  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0990-4

2. Methods and approaches for the management of arthropod border incursions
Davina L. Saccaggi, Minette Karsten, Mark P. Robertson, Sabrina Kumschick, Michael J. Somers, John R. U. Wilson, John S. Terblanche
Biological Invasions  vol: 18  issue: 4  first page: 1057  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1085-6

3. The balance of trade in alien species between South Africa and the rest of Africa
Katelyn T. Faulkner, Brett P. Hurley, Mark P. Robertson, Mathieu Rouget, John R.U. Wilson
Bothalia  vol: 47  issue: 2  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2157

4. The Legacy Effects of Colonial and Apartheid Imprints on Urban Greening in South Africa: Spaces, Species, and Suitability
Charlie M. Shackleton, N. Gwedla
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution  vol: 8  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.579813

5. Lessons and challenges in creating alien species lists: insights from South Africa’s national reports on the status and management of biological invasions
Tsungai A. Zengeya, Katelyn T. Faulkner, Masingitla P. Mtileni, John R. U. Wilson
NeoBiota  vol: 101  first page: 203  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.101.162932

6. Indicators for monitoring biological invasions at a national level
John R. U. Wilson, Katelyn T. Faulkner, Sebataolo J. Rahlao, David M. Richardson, Tsungai A. Zengeya, Brian W. van Wilgen, Céline Bellard
Journal of Applied Ecology  vol: 55  issue: 6  first page: 2612  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13251

7. An inventory of native-alien populations in South Africa
Takalani Nelufule, Mark P. Robertson, John R. U. Wilson, Katelyn T. Faulkner
Scientific Data  vol: 10  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02119-w

8. Quantifying errors and omissions in alien species lists: The introduction status of Melaleuca species in South Africa as a case study
Llewellyn Jacobs, John Wilson, Brendan Lepschi, David Richardson
NeoBiota  vol: 32  first page: 89  year: 2017  
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.32.9842

9. Prioritising surveillance for alien organisms transported as stowaways on ships travelling to South Africa
Katelyn T. Faulkner, Mark P. Robertson, Mathieu Rouget, John R. U. Wilson, Christopher W. McKindsey
PLOS ONE  vol: 12  issue: 4  first page: e0173340  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173340