Original Research

Making the case for biodiversity in South Africa: Re-framing biodiversity communications

Kristal Maze, Mandy Barnett, Emily A. Botts, Anthea Stephens, Mike Freedman, Lars Guenther
Bothalia | Vol 46, No 1 | a2039 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v46i1.2039 | © 2016 Kristal Maze, Mandy Barnett, Emily A. Botts, Anthea Stephens, Mike Freedman, Lars Guenther | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 18 November 2015 | Published: 03 December 2016

About the author(s)

Kristal Maze, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South Africa
Mandy Barnett, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South Africa
Emily A. Botts, Independent consultant, South Africa
Anthea Stephens, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South Africa
Mike Freedman, Freedthinkers, South Africa
Lars Guenther, Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Biodiversity education and public awareness do not always contain the motivational messages that inspire action amongst decision-makers. Traditional messages from the biodiversity sector are often framed around threat, with a generally pessimistic tone. Aspects of social marketing can be used to support positive messaging that is more likely to inspire action amongst the target audience.
Objectives: The South African biodiversity sector embarked on a market research process to better understand the target audiences for its messages and develop a communications strategy that would reposition biodiversity as integral to the development trajectory of South Africa.
Method: The market research process combined stakeholder analysis, market research, engagement and facilitated dialogue. Eight concept messages were developed that framed biodiversity communications in different ways. These messages were tested with the target audience to assess which were most relevant in a developing-world context.
Results: The communications message that received the highest ranking in the market research process was the concept of biodiversity as a ‘national asset’. This frame places biodiversity as an equivalent national priority to other economic and social imperatives. Other messages that ranked highly were the emotional message of biodiversity as ‘our children’s legacy’ and the action-based ‘practical solutions’.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, a communications strategy known as ‘Making the case for biodiversity’ was developed that re-framed the economic, emotional and practical value propositions for biodiversity. The communications strategy has already resulted in greater political and economic attention towards biodiversity in South Africa.

Keywords

Biodiversity; Branding; CEPA; Communication; Marketing; Socio-economic development; Stakeholders; Value proposition

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4084
Total article views: 6546

 

Crossref Citations

1. Understanding and Influencing Perceptions about Marine Protected Areas Through an Aquarium Exhibit: A Multi-phase Case Study from South Africa
Judy B. Mann-Lang, Thashnee Naidoo, Elizabeth Francolini, Bruce Q Mann, Kerry Sink, Colette Bodenstaff
Journal of Interpretation Research  vol: 28  issue: 1  first page: 50  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1177/10925872231153164

2. Systematic conservation planning for people and nature: Biodiversity, ecosystem services, and equitable benefit sharing
Myriam J. Perschke, Linda R. Harris, Kerry J. Sink, Amanda T. Lombard
Ecosystem Services  vol: 68  first page: 101637  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101637

3. Taking state of biodiversity reporting into the information age – A South African perspective
Carol Jean Poole, Andrew Luke Skowno, Jock C. Currie, Kerry Jennifer Sink, Brenda Daly, Lize von Staden
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution  vol: 11  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1107956

4. National biodiversity and ecosystem assessments for conservation impact: Uptake and lessons learnt from the South African experience
Jessica M. da Silva, Colleen L. Seymour, Linda R. Harris, Lara van Niekerk, Anisha Dayaram, Amanda Driver, Thapelo Kgomo, Sediqa Khatieb, Samukelisiwe T. Msweli, Kerry Sink, Ntakadzeni Tshidada, Lize von Staden, Carol J. Poole, Andrew L. Skowno
Ambio  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02285-8

5. Understanding communities’ perceptions, demographics and uses of wetlands in Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, South Africa
Mwazvita T. B. Dalu, Onica Mukhuwana, Ross N. Cuthbert, Thomas Marambanyika, Ashley W. Gunter, Florence M. Murungweni, Tatenda Dalu
Wetlands Ecology and Management  vol: 30  issue: 6  first page: 1231  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1007/s11273-022-09892-2

6. Green environment and incident depression in South Africa: a geospatial analysis and mental health implications in a resource-limited setting
Andrew Tomita, Alain M Vandormael, Diego Cuadros, Enrico Di Minin, Vuokko Heikinheimo, Frank Tanser, Rob Slotow, Jonathan K Burns
The Lancet Planetary Health  vol: 1  issue: 4  first page: e152  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30063-3

7. Unlocking and securing ecological infrastructure investments: The needs and willingness to invest and institutional support mechanisms used
Malukhanye S. Mbopha, Christo Marais, Theo Kleynhans, Karen J. Esler
South African Journal of Science  vol: 117  issue: 9/10  year: 2021  
doi: 10.17159/sajs.2021/8666

8. Measuring the effectiveness of value-framing and message valence on audience engagement across countries
Katie Blake, Takahiro Kubo, Diogo Veríssimo
Global Environmental Psychology  vol: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.5964/gep.11181