Original Research
Evaluating the outcomes and processes of a research-action partnership: The need for continuous reflective evaluation
Submitted: 16 August 2016 | Published: 03 December 2016
About the author(s)
Chantal Taylor, School of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaJessica Cockburn, Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, South Africa
Mathieu Rouget, School of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Invasion Biology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee, School of Liberal Studies, Azim Premji University, Bangalore, India
Shomen Mukherjee, School of Liberal Studies, Azim Premji University, Bangalore, India
Rob Slotow, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College, London, United Kingdom
Debra Roberts, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and Sustainable and Resilient City Initiatives Unit, eThekwini Municipality, South Africa
Richard Boon, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department, eThekwini Municipality, South Africa
Sean O’Donoghue, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department, eThekwini Municipality, South Africa
Errol Douwes, School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department, eThekwini Municipality, South Africa
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives were (1) to describe how a continuous reflective evaluation approach helped to better understand the research programme and its outcomes; and (2) to assess research outputs and outcomes, relevance of outcomes to the requirements of EM, and participants’ perceptions of the programme (both the outcomes and the process).
Methods: The evaluation took a mixed methods approach, combining various quantitative and qualitative methods such as anonymous individual questionnaires, reflective exercises and group reflections.
Results: The KZNSS programme was successful in capacity building and establishing a long-term partnership, but had lower scientific publication output and practice uptake than expected. Participants’ perceptions changed over time, with a decrease in the perceived success of addressing tangible research outcomes, and an increase in the perceived success of collaborative relationships in the partnership.
Conclusion: Transdisciplinary partnerships can be a means of integrating research into policy and practice through knowledge exchange. An important lesson in the early stages of this partnership was to pay attention to the process and not only the outputs. The study highlights the importance of continuous participatory reflection and evaluation in such partnerships.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3856Total article views: 5473
Crossref Citations
1. Revealing mechanisms in a transdisciplinary Community Reforestation Research Programme
Michael R. Ward, Eureta Rosenberg
African Evaluation Journal vol: 8 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/aej.v8i1.467
2. Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self
My M. Sellberg, Jessica Cockburn, Petra B. Holden, David P. M. Lam
Ecosystems and People vol: 17 issue: 1 first page: 292 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1931452
3. Co-creation between cities and climate change science achieves research and action agenda
N.B. Hunter, D.C. Roberts, C. Sutherland, R. Slotow
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability vol: 4 first page: 100189 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100189
4. Science for implementation: the roles, experiences, and perceptions of practitioners involved in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
M. A. North, N. B. Hunter, D. C. Roberts, R. Slotow
Climate Action vol: 1 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s44168-022-00025-2
5. Adaptive management in restoration initiatives: Lessons learned from some of South Africa's projects
Hloniphani Moyo, Rob Slotow, Mathieu Rouget, Lutendo Mugwedi, Errol Douwes, Zivanayi Tsvuura, Thulani Tshabalala
South African Journal of Botany vol: 139 first page: 352 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.03.016
6. Improving the management of threatened ecosystems in an urban biodiversity hotspot through the Durban Research Action Partnership
Mathieu Rouget, Sean O’Donoghue, Chantal Taylor, Debra Roberts, Rob Slotow
Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation vol: 46 issue: 2 year: 2016
doi: 10.4102/abc.v46i2.2199
7. Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy
Denis B. Karcher, Christopher Cvitanovic, Rebecca M. Colvin, Ingrid E. van Putten, Mark S. Reed
Environmental Science & Policy vol: 125 first page: 202 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.012
8. Guiding principles for transdisciplinary sustainability research and practice
Maureen G. Reed, James P. Robson, Mariana Campos Rivera, Francisco Chapela, Iain Davidson‐Hunt, Peter Friedrichsen, Eleanor Haine, Anthony Blair Dreaver Johnston, Gabriela Lichtenstein, Laura S. Lynes, Majing Oloko, Michelle Sánchez Luja, Sheona Shackleton, Marlene Soriano, Fermín Sosa Peréz, Liette Vasseur
People and Nature vol: 5 issue: 4 first page: 1094 year: 2023
doi: 10.1002/pan3.10496
9. Evaluating quality mechanisms in collaborative open distance learning (ODL) course development using lecturers’ perspectives
Estelle Van Rensburg, Anneke Venter, Michele Van Wyk, Jane Ndinisa, Albert Michau
The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning vol: 16 issue: 1 first page: 24 year: 2024
doi: 10.17159/44bj3k02
10. Getting personal with collaborative sustainability experimentation: Reflections and recommendations from a transdisciplinary partnership with the Swedish craft beer sector
Barry Ness, Darin Wahl
Ambio vol: 51 issue: 12 first page: 2544 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01751-x
11. Towards greater clarity of the science-policy-practice interface: a framework to address environmental challenges
Dinh Cong Huynh, Anna Hurlimann, Judy Bush
Sustainability Science year: 2026
doi: 10.1007/s11625-026-01837-5
12. Land-use planning as a tool for balancing the scientific and the social in biodiversity and ecosystem services mainstreaming? The case of Durban, South Africa
Wan-Yu Shih, Leslie Mabon
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management vol: 61 issue: 13 first page: 2338 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1394277
13. City/science intersections: A scoping review of science for policy in urban contexts
Gabriela Manrique Rueda, Zoé Poirier Stephens, Marie-Christine Therrien, Yan Kestens, Joris Arnaud, Noémie Pascal
Cities vol: 152 first page: 105132 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105132
14. Pharmacogenomics for neurodegenerative disorders - a focused review
S. Rehan Ahmad, Md. Zeyaullah, Mohammad Suhail Khan, Abdullah M. AlShahrani, Abdelrhman A. Galaleldin Altijani, Haroon Ali, Adam Dawria, Ali Mohieldin, Mohammad Shane Alam, Awad Osman Abdalla Mohamed
Frontiers in Pharmacology vol: 15 year: 2024
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1478964
