Short Communication

Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland 2009 and 2012: A description of changes from 2006

Anisha Dayaram, Leslie Powrie, Tony Rebelo, Andrew Skowno
Bothalia | Vol 47, No 1 | a2223 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v47i1.2223 | © 2017 Anisha Dayaram, Leslie Powrie, Tony Rebelo, Andrew Skowno | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 February 2017 | Published: 29 June 2017

About the author(s)

Anisha Dayaram, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch, South Africa
Leslie Powrie, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch, South Africa
Tony Rebelo, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch, South Africa
Andrew Skowno, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The variety of applications in which the Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland (VEGMAP) is used requires the map to be continually updated and refined to reflect the latest available information. The VEGMAP has been updated twice, in 2009 and 2012, since its first release in 2006.
Objectives: The first objective is to report on the motivations for changes in the 2009 and 2012 versions. The second objective is to describe new vegetation types and subtypes included in these versions.
Method: Changes to the VEGMAP are implemented after a peer-review process that is managed by the National Vegetation Map Committee. Accepted changes are then incorporated into the VEGMAP using GIS software.
Results: Seventy-one of the 449 vegetation types were affected by updates. Changes included the addition of new vegetation types and subtypes, modifications to the boundaries of types present in the 2006 VEGMAP and changes to the names of vegetation types.
Conclusion: The updates have affected a small portion of the map but have reflected a progressive refinement in quality. Regions that are still mapped at a coarse scale, especially those earmarked for land-use development, should be prioritised for improved map accuracy and classification through a more proactive approach towards vegetation mapping, using guidelines that are under development.

Keywords

VEGMAP; Vegetation Classification; National Vegetation Map Update

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3722
Total article views: 14623

 

Crossref Citations

1. The Diepkloof Rock Shelter foodplant fitness landscape, Western Cape, South Africa
Marlize Lombard
Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa  vol: 58  issue: 2  first page: 214  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/0067270X.2023.2198852

2. Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland 2018: A description of changes since 2006
Anisha Dayaram, Linda R. Harris, Barend A. Grobler, Stephni Van der Merwe, Anthony G. Rebelo, Leslie Ward Powrie, Johannes H.J. Vlok, Philip G. Desmet, Mcebisi Qabaqaba, Keneilwe M. Hlahane, Andrew L. Skowno
Bothalia  vol: 49  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4102/abc.v49i1.2452

3. Multi temporal vegetation mapping of the Tibetan Plateau via machine learning model simulation and experiential knowledge
Jihua Zhou, Liming Lai, Qiaoe Chen, Changqing Song, Peichao Gao, Sijing Ye, Shi Shen, Ganggang Yang, Haixia Hao, Guihao Wang, Zhe Xiong, Yuanrun Zheng
Chinese Science Bulletin  vol: 70  issue: 1  first page: 134  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1360/TB-2024-0496

4. Vegetation type conservation targets, status and level of protection in KwaZulu-Natal in 2016
Debbie Jewitt,
Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation  vol: 48  issue: 1  year: 2018  
doi: 10.4102/abc.v48i1.2294

5. The Current Phyto-Scape and Foodplants of Holley Shelter, KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) and Its Potential for Past Foragers
Marlize Lombard, Gregor D. Bader, Manuel Will
African Archaeological Review  vol: 42  issue: 1  first page: 125  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s10437-024-09603-7