Original Research

Has strategic planning made a difference to amphibian conservation research in South Africa?

John Measey, Jeanne Tarrant, Alex Rebelo, Andrew Turner, Louis du Preez, Mohlamatsane Mokhatla, Werner Conradie
Bothalia | Vol 49, No 1 | a2428 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v49i1.2428 | © 2019 John Measey, Jeanne Tarrant, Alex Rebelo, Andrew Turner, Louis du Preez, Mohlamatsane Mokhatla, Werner Conradie | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 December 2018 | Published: 25 September 2019

About the author(s)

John Measey, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Jeanne Tarrant, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Alex Rebelo, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; and, Port Elizabeth Museum, Humewood, South Africa
Andrew Turner, CapeNature Scientific Services, Stellenbosch, South Africa; and, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
Louis du Preez, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa
Mohlamatsane Mokhatla, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; and, Rondevlei Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Sedgefield, South Africa
Werner Conradie, Port Elizabeth Museum, Humewood, South Africa; and, School of Natural Resource Management, Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Conservation relies on the strategic use of resources because monies for conservation action are limited, especially in developing countries. South Africa’s Frog Atlas project established a baseline for the country’s amphibian data and threat levels in 2004, and in 2009 a prioritisation exercise developed a strategy for conservation research.

Objectives: In this article, we assess this strategy for conservation research.

Method: We conducted a quantitative and qualitative assessment of research undertaken since the strategy was developed.

Results: The strategy has produced a lasting impact on taxonomy, ecological studies, monitoring and capacity building. Publications in all areas have increased, but particularly in conservation ecology. Other indicators are increases in the numbers of locality records for target taxa, species descriptions and postgraduate degrees with amphibians as the principal topic. We document important milestones for South African amphibian conservation, including the first Biodiversity Management Plan for Species (BMP-S) for Hyperolius pickersgilli, a smart device app that uploads locality data to an open access database, 15 years of monitoring data and new amphibian identification books for adults and children. The Red List Index calculated for South African amphibians shows that the country’s species are becoming more threatened (a 1% reduction in 10 years), but a hindcasting exercise suggests that most of the damage was already done by 1990. We provide a checklist for 131 amphibian species in South Africa, of which 82 species are endemic.

Conclusion: A strategy for conservation research was found to greatly augment the focus of research on South African frogs. A new strategy should focus on fewer taxa over meaningful time spans.


Keywords

threatened species; Red List Index; Anura; conservation research; strategy

Metrics

Total abstract views: 405
Total article views: 215


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.